Care Ideals in the Netherlands: Shifts between 2002 and 2011
Canadian Journal on Aging , Volume 34 - Issue 3 p. 268- 281
Our study’s premise was that normative care beliefs can inform the current care policy debate. We conducted latent class regression analyses on two waves of Netherlands Kinship Panel Study data (n = 4,163) to distinguish care ideals that captured multiple dimensions of normative care beliefs simultaneously. We also assessed how these care ideals have shifted in the early twenty-first century. We distinguished four care ideals: warm-modern (family and state jointly responsible for caring, egalitarian gender roles), cold-modern (large state responsibility, restricted family responsibility, egalitarian gender roles), traditional (restricted state responsibility, large family responsibility, moderately traditional gender roles), and cold-traditional (large state responsibility, restricted family responsibility, traditional gender roles). Between 2002 and 2011, there has been a shift away from warm-modern care ideals and towards cold-modern care ideals. This is remarkable, because Dutch policy makers have increasingly encouraged family members to take on an active role in caring for dependent relatives.
|aging, de-familialization, family obligations, long-term care, Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, refamilialization|
|Canadian Journal on Aging|
|This work was funded by the European Commission 7th Framework Programme; grant id fp7/320116 - Changing families and sustainable societies: Policy contexts and diversity over the life course and across generations (FAMILIESANDSOCIETIES)|
|Organisation||Centre for Rotterdam Cultural Sociology (CROCUS)|
van den Broek, M.P.B, Dykstra, P.A, & van der Veen, R.J. (2015). Care Ideals in the Netherlands: Shifts between 2002 and 2011. Canadian Journal on Aging, 34(3), 268–281. doi:10.1017/S0714980815000215