Aims: The long-term follow-up of the first-in-man ABSORB Cohort B trial showed that angiographic binary restenosis can occur early, late or very late after implantation of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS). Since the mechanical support of the scaffold decreases during bioresorption, the mechanism of in-segment restenosis (ISR) of the Absorb BVS might be different from that of metallic stents. The objective of the current analysis was to review the multimodality imaging of cases with binary restenosis to elucidate the mechanism of ISR after Absorb BVS implantation. Methods and results: The ABSORB Cohort B trial enrolled 101 patients with a maximum of two de novo coronary lesions. At the three-year imaging and clinical follow-up, there were six cases of in-segment binary restenosis: two early ISR (<6 months), one late ISR (6-12 months) and three very late ISR (>12 months). Three of these ISR cases seemed to be induced by anatomical or procedural factors. In the other three cases, intravascular imaging (IVUS/OCT) demonstrated that the main mechanism of restenosis was significant intra-scaffold tissue growth, while the structural circularity and diameter of the scaffold were not affected. Conclusions: Early and late restenosis after implantation of the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold could be related to anatomical or procedural factors. In this small cohort of patients late or very late restenosis seems to be attributed to pure intra-scaffold tissue growth without extrinsic encroachment of the scaffold.

Bioresorbable scaffold, Everolimus, Intravascular imaging, Long-term follow-up, Restenosis
dx.doi.org/10.4244/EIJV10I11A218, hdl.handle.net/1765/91600
EuroIntervention
Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam

Nakatani, T, Onuma, Y, Ishibashi, Y, Muramatsu, T, Iqbal, J, Zhang, Y, … Serruys, P.W.J.C. (2015). Early (before 6 months), late (6-12 months) and very late (after 12 months) angiographic scaffold restenosis in the ABSORB cohort B trial. EuroIntervention, 10(11), 1288–1298. doi:10.4244/EIJV10I11A218