Impact of collateral status evaluated by dynamic computed tomographic angiography on clinical outcome in patients with ischemic stroke
Stroke , Volume 46 - Issue 12 p. 3398- 3404
Background and Purpose - Status of collateral circulation is a strong predictor of outcome after acute ischemic stroke. Our aim was to compare the predictive value of strategies for collateral blood flow assessment with dynamic computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and conventional single-phase CT angiography. Methods - Patients with a proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion underwent noncontrast CT, single-phase CTA and whole brain CT perfusion/dynamic CTA within 9 hours after stroke onset. We defined poor outcome as a score on the modified Rankin Scale score of ≥3. The association between collateral score and clinical outcome at 3 months was analyzed with Poisson regression. The prognostic value of collateral scoring with dynamic CTA and single-phase CTA in addition to age, stroke severity, and noncontrast CT was assessed with logistic regression and summarized with the area under the curve. Results - Seventy patients were included, with a mean age of 68 years. We observed an increased risk of poor outcome in patients with poor collaterals on single-phase CTA (risk ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.1) and on dynamic CTA (risk ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.7). The prediction of poor clinical outcome by means of collateral adjustment was better with dynamic CTA (area under the curve, 0.84; likelihood ratio test P<0.01) than by single-phase CTA (area under the curve, 0.80; likelihood ratio test P=0.33). Conclusions - Collateral assessment with dynamic CTA better predicts clinical outcome at 3 months than single-phase conventional CTA.
|, , ,|
|Organisation||Department of Neurology|
Van Den Wijngaard, I.R, Boiten, J, Holswilder, G, Algra, A, Dippel, D.W.J, Velthuis, B.K, … van Walderveen, M.A.A. (2015). Impact of collateral status evaluated by dynamic computed tomographic angiography on clinical outcome in patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke, 46(12), 3398–3404. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010354