The spacing effect refers to the finding that memory for repeated items improves when the interrepetition interval increases. To explain the spacing effect in free-recall tasks, a two-factor model has been put forward that combines mechanisms of contextual variability and study-phase retrieval (e.g., Raaijmakers, 2003; Verkoeijen, Rikers, & Schmidt, 2004). An important, yet untested, implication of this model is that free recall of repetitions should follow an inverted u-shaped relationship with interrepetition spacing. To demonstrate the suggested relationship an experiment was conducted. Participants studied a word list, consisting of items repeated at different interrepetition intervals, either under incidental or under intentional learning instructions. Subsequently, participants received a free-recall test. The results revealed an inverted u-shaped relationship between free recall and interrepetition spacing in both the incidental-learning condition and the intentionallearning condition. Moreover, for intentionally learned repetitions, the maximum free-recall performance was located at a longer interrepetition interval than for incidentally learned repetitions. These findings are interpreted in terms of the twofactor model of spacing effects in free-recall tasks.

, ,,
Experimental Psychology
Department of Psychology

Verkoeijen, P., & Schmidt, H. (2005). Limitations to the Spacing Effect: Demonstration of an Inverted U-shaped Relationship Between Interrepetition Spacing and Free Recall. Experimental Psychology, 52(4), 264–271. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.264