Introduction: This article is part of the series “How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions” in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed. Areas covered: This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE. Expert commentary: Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use.

Additional Metadata
Keywords clinical practice guidelines, data-extraction, economic evaluations, quality appraisal, risk of bias, Systematic reviews
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961, hdl.handle.net/1765/94466
Journal Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Citation
Wijnen, B.F.M, van Mastrigt, G.A.P.G, Redekop, W.K, Majoie, H., De Kinderen, R., & Evers, S.M.A.A. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3). Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (Vol. 16, pp. 723–732). doi:10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961