In international development, shared ownership is assumed to be a condition for effectiveness. Academic studies question this relation, claiming shared ownership can instead lead to ineffectiveness. This study analysed the interplay between ownership and effectiveness in a transnational advocacy network for conflict prevention observed 2012–2015. Building on recent discussions about balancing unity and diversity in networks, this article unpacks the ownership/effectiveness relationship into three dimensions: collective identity, accountability processes and a shared advocacy message. We find that the question is not about more or less effectiveness, but about the processes shaping the meaning of effectiveness in particular institutional constellations.

Additional Metadata
Keywords advocacy, development, effectiveness, networks, Ownership, politics of effectiveness, transnational advocacy networks
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1257908, hdl.handle.net/1765/95108
Journal Third World Quarterly: journal of emerging areas
Citation
Arensman, B. (Bodille), van Wessel, M. (Margit), & Hilhorst, D.J.M. (2017). Does local ownership bring about effectiveness? The case of a transnational advocacy network. Third World Quarterly: journal of emerging areas, 38(6), 1310–1326. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1257908