2017-06-01
On the structure of dispositions. Transposability of and oppositions between aesthetic dispositions
Publication
Publication
Poetics : Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts
Cultural sociology has reached conclusions about the properties of dispositions based on analyses of aesthetic principles external to the individual. I challenge this approach, and I reflect on two assumptions regarding the structure of dispositions prevalent in cultural sociology that ensue from this approach: (1) Dispositions are transposable across aesthetic domains (e.g., music, literature, visual arts), and (2) there exists one hegemonic configuration of dispositions which can be derived from the structure of the cultural field. I use data from an audience survey in two art museums in Flanders (Belgium) (n = 1448) and analyse aesthetic dispositions towards visual arts and towards music. Applying Relational Class Analysis, I find different dispositional configurations. These configurations are characterised by oppositions between aesthetic principles that do not coincide with the oppositions between aesthetic principles in the cultural field. Moreover, these configurations suggest that dispositions vary to the extent that they are transposable across aesthetic domains.
| Additional Metadata | |
|---|---|
| , , , , , | |
| doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2017.01.004, hdl.handle.net/1765/95795 | |
| Poetics : Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts | |
| Organisation | Department of Sociology |
|
Daenekindt, S. (2017). On the structure of dispositions. Transposability of and oppositions between aesthetic dispositions. Poetics : Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2017.01.004 |
|
