2016-10-01
Cloud-processed 4D CMR flow imaging for pulmonary flow quantification
Publication
Publication
European Journal of Radiology , Volume 85 - Issue 10 p. 1849- 1856
Objectives In this study, we evaluated a cloud-based platform for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) four-dimensional (4D) flow imaging, with fully integrated correction for eddy currents, Maxwell phase effects, and gradient field non-linearity, to quantify forward flow, regurgitation, and peak systolic velocity over the pulmonary artery. Methods We prospectively recruited 52 adult patients during one-year period from July 2014. The 4D flow and planar (2D) phase-contrast (PC) were acquired during same scanning session, but 4D flow was scanned after injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Eddy-currents were semi-automatically corrected using the web-based software. Flow over pulmonary valve was measured and the 4D flow values were compared against the 2D PC ones. Results The mean forward flow was 92 (±30) ml/cycle measured with 4D flow and 86 (±29) ml/cycle measured with 2D PC, with a correlation of 0.82 and a mean difference of −6 ml/cycle (−41–29). For the regurgitant fraction the correlation was 0.85 with a mean difference of −0.95% (−17–15). Mean peak systolic velocity measured with 4D flow was 92 (±49) cm/s and 108 (±56) cm/s with 2D PC, having a correlation of 0.93 and a mean difference of 16 cm/s (−24–55). Conclusion 4D flow imaging post-processed with an integrated cloud-based application accurately quantifies pulmonary flow. However, it may underestimate the peak systolic velocity.
| Additional Metadata | |
|---|---|
| , , , , | |
| doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.018, hdl.handle.net/1765/96155 | |
| European Journal of Radiology | |
| Organisation | Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam |
|
Chelu, R. G., Wanambiro, K.W. (Kevin W.), Hsiao, A. (Albert), Swart, L., Voogd, T. (Teun), van den Hoven, A., … Nieman, K. (2016). Cloud-processed 4D CMR flow imaging for pulmonary flow quantification. European Journal of Radiology, 85(10), 1849–1856. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.018 |
|