2016-09-01
Observation of Depictive Versus Tracing Gestures Selectively Aids Verbal Versus Visual–Spatial Learning in Primary School Children
Publication
Publication
Applied Cognitive Psychology , Volume 30 - Issue 5 p. 806- 814
Previous research has established that gesture observation aids learning in children. The current study examined whether observation of gestures (i.e. depictive and tracing gestures) differentially affected verbal and visual–spatial retention when learning a route and its street names. Specifically, we explored whether children (n =97) with lower visual and verbal workingmemory capacity benefited more from observing gestures as compared with children who score higher on these traits. To this end, 11- to 13-year-old children were presented with an instructional video of a route containing no gestures, depictive gestures, tracing gestures or both depictive and tracing gestures. Results indicated that the type of observed gesture affected performance: Observing tracing gestures or both tracing and depictive gestures increased performance on route retention, while observing depictive gestures or both depictive and tracing gestures increased performance on street name retention. These effects were not differentially affected by working-memory capacity.
| Additional Metadata | |
|---|---|
| doi.org/10.1002/acp.3256, hdl.handle.net/1765/97244 | |
| Applied Cognitive Psychology | |
| Organisation | Department of Psychology |
|
van Wermeskerken, M., Fijan, N., Eielts, C., & Pouw, W. (2016). Observation of Depictive Versus Tracing Gestures Selectively Aids Verbal Versus Visual–Spatial Learning in Primary School Children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 806–814. doi:10.1002/acp.3256 |
|