The analysis of payment data has become an important task for operators and overseers of financial market infrastructures. Payment data provide an accurate description of how banks manage their liquidity over time. In this paper we compare three models to predict future liquidity flows from payment data: 1) a moving average model, 2) a linear dynamic system that links the inflow of banks with their outflow, and 3) a similar dynamic system but with a constraint that guarantees the conservation of liquidity. The error graphs of one-step-ahead predictions on real-world payment data reveal that the moving average model performs best, followed by the dynamic system with constraint, and finally the dynamic system without constraint.

, , ,
, , , , ,
hdl.handle.net/1765/99732
CentER Discussion Paper Series
Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus University

Triepels, R., & Daniels, H. (2016). A Comparison of Three Models to Predict Liquidity Flows between Banks Based on Daily Payments Transactions. CentER Discussion Paper Series. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/99732