Regrafting of the Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor-Site: Is It Beneficial?
Split-thickness skin grafting remains a fundamental treatment for patients with deep burns and other traumatic injuries. Unfortunately, the donor site wound that remains after split skin graft (SSG) harvesting may also cause problems for the patient; they can lead to discomfort and scars with a poor cosmetic outcome. Regrafting of the donor site is one of the methods described to improve donor site healing and scarring. In this report, we describe a case of a 26-year-old woman with a self-inflicted chemical burn (0.5% TBSA) who underwent split skin grafting. During surgery, only part of the donor site was regrafted with split skin graft remnants. This part healed faster and had a better scar quality at 3 months postsurgery. Nevertheless, the appearance and patients' opinion on the regrafted part deteriorated after 12 months. With this case report, we aim to create awareness of the long-term consequences of regrafting, which may differ from short-time results. Patients expected to have poor reepithelialization potential may benefit from regrafting of the SSG on the donor site. But in healthy young individuals, timewise there would be no benefit since it can lead to an aesthetically displeasing result.
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irz166, hdl.handle.net/1765/124349|
|Series||VSNU Open Access deal|
|Journal||Journal of Burn Care and Research|
|Note||corresponding author at Maasstad Ziekenhuis|
Legemate, C.M, Lucas, Y. (Ymke), Oen, I.M.M.H, & van der Vlies, C.H. (2020). Regrafting of the Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor-Site: Is It Beneficial?. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 41(1), 211–214. doi:10.1093/jbcr/irz166