This paper introduces a parameter-free method for measuring the weighting functions of prospect theory and rank-dependent utility. These weighting functions capture risk attitudes, subjective beliefs, and ambiguity attitudes. Our method, called the midweight method, is based on a convenient way to obtain midpoints in the weighting function scale. It can be used both for risk (known probabilities) and for uncertainty (unknown probabilities). The resulting integrated treatment of risk and uncertainty is particularly useful for measuring the differences between them: ambiguity. Compared to existing methods to measure ambiguity attitudes, our method is more efficient and it can accommodate violations of expected utility under risk. An experiment demonstrates the feasibility and tractability of our method, yielding plausible results such as ambiguity aversion for moderate and high likelihoods but ambiguity seeking for low likelihoods, as predicted by Ellsberg.

Pessimism, Probability Weighting, Prospect Theory
hdl.handle.net/1765/21474
ERIM Top-Core Articles
Management Science
Submitted Manuscript (March 2009)
Erasmus Research Institute of Management

van de Kuilen, G, & Wakker, P.P. (2009). The Midweight Method to Measure Attitudes towards Risk and Ambiguity. Management Science, 1–32. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/21474