In a context of highly visible and politically influential populist movements, this study considers the online self-representation of the Tea Party Patriots (TPP) in the United States and the Party for Freedom (PVV) in the Netherlands. A multi-methodological approach was adopted to compare the discursive manifestation of key populism concepts: leadership characteristics, adversary definition and mobilizing information. Analyses reconstruct and account for similarities and differences in discursive framing strategies of 'double differentiation' through which both movements attempt inclusion in and exclusion from the political establishment, and, in doing so, mobilize communities of support. Altogether, this study advances the understanding of what constitutes 'unmediated' content that is presented through user-generated media production, and how self-determined media spaces have facilitated shifts in populist media legitimation and political representation in two politically unique countries.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Cross-national comparative politics, double differentiation, framing, mobilization, online media, populism
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450685, hdl.handle.net/1765/39548
Series ERMeCC - Erasmus Research Centre for Media, Communication and Culture
Journal New Media & Society
Citation
Groshek, J, & Engelbert, J.M. (2013). Double differentiation in a cross-national comparison of populist political movements and online media uses in the United States and the Netherlands. New Media & Society, 15(2), 183–202. doi:10.1177/1461444812450685